Dictionary Definition
vegan n : a strict vegetarian; someone who eats
no animal or dairy products at all
User Contributed Dictionary
English
Pronunciation
- Rhymes: -iːɡən
Noun
- A supporter of veganism
- A person who does not consume, use or eat any animal products.
- Someone from Vega, which is either a town in Norway, Sweden or Texas or the system of the star.
Translations
person who consumes no animal products
someone from Vega
- Finnish: vegalainen
Adjective
- Relating to vegans or veganism.
- Relating to Vega (the star).
Translations
relating to vegans or veganism
- Dutch: veganistisch
- Finnish: vegaaninen
- German: vegan
- Italian: vegano
- Polish: wegański , wegańska , wegańskie
See also
German
Adjective
veganExtensive Definition
Veganism is a philosophy and lifestyle that seeks to
exclude the use of animals for food, clothing, or any other
purpose. Properly planned vegan diets are healthful and have been
found to completely satisfy nutritional needs in every stage of
life, including during pregnancy and lactation. However, poorly
planned vegan diets can be low in levels of calcium, iodine, vitamin B and
vitamin
D. Vegans are therefore encouraged to plan their diet and take
dietary
supplements as appropriate. or /ˈvɛdʒən/, was originally derived from "vegetarian"
in 1944 when Elsie Shrigley and Donald
Watson, frustrated that the term "vegetarianism" had come to
include the eating of dairy products, founded the UK
Vegan Society. They combined the first three and last two letters
of vegetarian to form "vegan," which they saw as "the beginning and
end of vegetarian." The Vegan
Society defines veganism in this way: [T]he
word "veganism" denotes a philosophy and way of living which seeks
to exclude — as far as is possible and practical — all forms of
exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any
other purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use
of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of humans, animals and
the environment. In dietary terms it denotes the practice of
dispensing with all products derived wholly or partly from
animals. Other vegan societies use similar
definitions.
Demographics
Data regarding the number of vegans is available
in some countries.
United States
A 2002 Time/CNN
poll
found that 4% of American
adults consider themselves vegetarians, and 5% of self-described
vegetarians consider themselves vegans, which implies that 0.2% of
American adults are vegans. A 2006 poll conducted by Harris
Interactive in the US listed specific foods and asked
respondents to indicate which items they never eat, rather than
asking respondents to self-identify. The survey found that of the
1,000 adults polled, 1.4% never eat meat, poultry, fish, seafood,
dairy products, or eggs and were therefore essentially vegan in
their eating habits. The survey also found that about 1.4% of men
and 1.3% of women have vegan diets.
Europe
In 2002, the UK Food Standards Agency reported that 5% of respondents self-identified as vegetarian or vegan. Though 29% of that 5% said they avoided "all animal products", only 5% reported avoiding dairy products. Based on these figures, approximately 0.25% of the UK population follow a vegan diet. In 2005, The Times estimated there were 250,000 vegans in Britain, which suggests around 0.4% of the UK population is vegan. However, a 2007 survey for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs into the UK population's attitudes and behaviour towards the environment found that 2.24% of the population identified themselves as vegan. In the same study, vegetarians who did not also eat chicken or fish made up 2.7% of the population. The DEFRA study also indicated that slightly more men than women are vegan, that more vegans live in towns or cities than the country, and that people aged 16-29 were vegan more often than any other age group.Various polls and research conducted during the
1990s put the percentage of Swedish residents
being vegan at between 0.27% and 1.6% of the entire population. A
study of the eating patterns of 2,538 Swedish children of ages 4, 8
and 11 by the
Swedish National Food Administration found that about 1% of the
children were vegetarian, less than 1% were lacto-vegetarians,
but found no children to be vegans. The website VeganWelt estimates
there to be between 250,000 and 460,500 vegans in Germany, or between
0.3% and 0.5% of the German population. The Netherlands Association
for Veganism estimates there to be approximately 16,000 vegans in
the Netherlands, or
around 0.1% of the Dutch population.
Animal products
The term "animal product" in a vegan context refers to any material derived from animals for human use. Notable animal products include meat, poultry, seafood, eggs, dairy products, honey, fur, leather, wool, and silk. Common animal by-products include gelatin, lanolin, rennet, whey, casein, beeswax, and shellac. many of these ingredients are esoteric, also have non-animal sources, and especially in non-food products may not even be identified.Although honey and silk are by definition animal
products, some vegans consider their use and the use of other
insect products to be acceptable.
Ethical concerns
Vegan organizations maintain that animals have certain rights, and as such it is not ethical for humans to use animals in ways that infringe those rights. Practices seen as cruel to animals include factory farming, animal testing, and displaying animals for entertainment in circuses, rodeos, and zoos.Philosopher Tom Regan
argues that animals are entities which possess "inherent value" and
therefore have "basic moral rights," and that the principal moral
right they possess is "the right to respectful treatment." Regan
additionally argues that animals have a "basic moral right not to
be harmed," which can be overridden only when the individual's
right to be harmed is "morally outweighed" by "other valid moral
principles." From this "rights view," Regan argues that "animal
agriculture, as we know it, is unjust" even when animals are raised
"humanely." Regan argues against various justifications for eating
meat including that "animal flesh is tasty," that it is "habit" for
"individuals and as a culture", that it is "convenient," that "meat
is nutritious," that there is an obligation the economic interests
of farmers or to the economic interests of a country, or that "farm
animals are legal property," and finds that all fail to treat
animals with the respect due to them by their basic rights. Regan
therefore argues that "those who support current animal agriculture
by purchasing meat have a moral obligation to stop doing so" and
that "the individual has a duty to lead a vegetarian way of
life."
Legal theorist Gary L.
Francione argues that animals are sentient, and that this is
sufficient to grant them moral consideration. Francione argues that
"all sentient beings should have at least one right—the
right not to be treated as property" and that there is "no moral
justification for using nonhumans for our purposes." Singer argues
that an animal's interests warrant
equal consideration with the interests of humans, and that not
doing so is "speciesist." Singer does not
contend that killing animals is always wrong, but that from a
practical standpoint it is "better to reject altogether the killing
of animals for food, unless one must do so to survive." Singer
therefore advocates both veganism and improved conditions for farm
animals as practical means to reduce animal suffering.
Steven Davis, a professor of animal
science at Oregon
State University, argues that following Tom Regan's "least harm
principle" may not necessarily require the adoption of a vegan
diet. Davis suggests that there are non-vegetarian diets which "may
kill fewer animals" than are killed in the intensive crop
production necessary to support vegetarian diets. In particular,
Davis argues that adopting a diet based upon "forage-ruminant-based agriculture" in
the United States would kill an estimated 380-450 million fewer
animals annually than a vegan diet and therefore that "humans may
be morally obligated to consume a diet from plant-based plus
pasture-forage-ruminant sysems."
Gaverick Matheny, a Ph.D. candidate in
agricultural economics at the University of Maryland, counters that
Davis' reasoning contains several major flaws, including
miscalculating the number of animal deaths based on land area
rather than per consumer, and incorrectly equating "the harm done
to animals […] to the number of animals killed." Matheny notes that
Davis' proposal is "a world apart" from agriculture "prevalent in
the United States" which would "greatly improve the lives of farmed
animals," but argues that per-consumer, a vegan diet would kill
fewer wild animals than a diet adhering to Davis' model, and that
vegetarianism "involves better treatment of animals, and likely
allows a greater number of animals with lives worth living to
exist."
William Jarvis, writing for
The National Council Against Health Fraud, characterizes
veganism as "a hygienic religion that meets deep emotional needs of
its followers," who revel "in self-denial and wars against
pleasure," and who "cannot be trusted to be objective, reliable
sources of information on anything that bears upon its fundamental
paradigm." Jarvis attacks "ideologic vegetarians," whom he claims
believe that "all life is sacred" and that "all forms of life have
equal value," saying that these beliefs "can lead to absurdities
such as allowing mosquitoes to spread malaria, or vipers to run
loose on one's premises."
Health
The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine recommends what they call the "Four New Food Groups." They suggest that vegans and vegetarians eat at least three servings of vegetables a day, including dark green, leafy vegetables such as broccoli, and dark yellow and orange such as carrots; five servings of whole grains (bread, rice, pasta); three of fruit; and two of legumes (beans, peas, lentils). in part because vegan diets are often high enough in fruit and vegetables to meet or exceed the recommended fruit and vegetable intakes.Benefits of vegetarian diets might be valid also
for strict vegan diets: according to the American Dietetic
Association and Dietitians of Canada, diets that avoid meat tend to
have lower levels of saturated fat, cholesterol, and animal
protein, and higher levels of carbohydrates, fiber, magnesium,
potassium, folate, and antioxidants, such as vitamins C and
E, and
phytochemicals. People who avoid meat are reported to have lower
body mass
index than those following the average Canadian diet; from this
follows lower death rates from ischemic
heart disease; lower blood cholesterol levels; lower blood
pressure; and lower rates of hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and
prostate and colon cancer. A 2003 study of British vegetarians,
including vegans, found similar mortality rates between vegetarians
and other groups.
A 2006 study found that in people with type 2
diabetes a low-fat vegan diet reduced weight, BMI,
total cholesterol,
and LDL
cholesterol and did so to a greater extent than the diet
prescribed by the
American Diabetes Association.
Precautions
Specific nutrients
The American Dietetic Association has said that "appropriately planned vegetarian diets are healthful, nutritionally adequate, and provide health benefits in the prevention and treatment of certain diseases." vitamin D, calcium, and omega-3 fatty acids. These deficiencies have potentially serious consequences, including anemia, rickets and cretinism in children, and osteomalacia Although clinical B deficiency is rare in vegans, In a 2002 laboratory study, more of the strict vegan participants' B and iron levels were compromised than those of lacto- or lacto-ovo-vegetarian participants.The Vegan
Society and Vegan
Outreach, and others, recommend that vegans either consistently
eat foods fortified with B or take a B supplement. Tempeh, seaweed,
spirulina, organic
produce, soil on unwashed vegetables, and intestinal bacteria have not
been shown to be reliable sources of B for the dietary needs of
vegans.
The authors of The China
Study argue that osteoporosis is linked to
the consumption of animal protein because animal protein, unlike
plant protein, increases the acidity of blood and tissues which is
then neutralized by calcium pulled from the bones. The authors add
that "in our rural China Study, where the animal to plant ratio
[for protein] was about 10%, the fracture rate is only one-fifth
that of the U.S."
For light skinned people, adequate amounts of
vitamin D may also be obtained by spending 15 to 30 minutes in the
sunlight every few days. Dark skinned people need significantly
more sunlight to obtain the same amount of vitamin D, and sunlight
exposure may be difficult for vegans in areas with low levels of
sunlight during winter; in these cases supplementation is
recommended. Certain mushrooms and some Vitamin
D2-fortified foods (where the Vitamin D2 is derived from
yeast) are the only food
sources of Vitamin D suitable for vegans.
Iodine
Iodine
supplementation may be necessary for vegans in countries where salt
is not typically iodized,
where it is iodized at low levels, or where, as in Britain or
Ireland,
animal products are used for iodine delivery. The American Dietetic
Association also considers well-planned vegan diets "appropriate
for all stages of the life cycle, including pregnancy and lactation,"
Vitamin B deficiency in lactating vegetarian mothers has been
linked to deficiencies and neurological
disorders in their children. Some research suggests that the
essential omega-3
fatty acid α-linolenic
acid and its derivatives should also be supplemented in
pregnant and lactating vegan mothers, since they are very low in
most vegan diets, and the metabolically related docosahexaenoic
acid (DHA) is essential to the developing visual
system. A maternal vegan diet has also been associated with low
birth weight, and a five times lower likelihood of having twins than those who eat animal
products.
Several cases of severe infant malnutrition and some
fatalities have been associated with a poorly planned vegan diet,
and provoked criticism of vegan diets for children. Parents
involved in these cases were convicted on charges ranging from
assault to felony
murder. Addressing criticism of veganism, Dr. Amy Lanou, an
expert
witness for the prosecution in one of the cases, asserted that
the child "was not killed by a vegan diet" but that "the real
problem was that he was not given enough food of any sort."
Eating disorders
The American Dietetic Association indicates that vegetarian diets may be more common among adolescents with eating disorders but that the evidence suggests that the adoption of a vegetarian diet does not lead to eating disorders, rather that "vegetarian diets may be selected to camouflage an existing eating disorder.".Resources and the environment
People who adopt veganism for environmental
reasons do so on the basis that veganism consumes far fewer
resources and causes less environmental damage than an animal-based
diet. Animal agriculture is linked to climate change, water
pollution, land degradation, and a decline in biodiversity.
Additionally, an animal-based diet uses more land, water, and
energy than a vegan diet.
The United Nations released a report in November
2006 linking animal agriculture to environmental damage. The
report, Livestock's
Long Shadow concludes that the livestock sector (primarily
cows, chickens, and pigs) emerges as one of the top two or three
most significant contributors to our most serious environmental
problems, at every scale from local to global. It is one of the
largest sources of greenhouse gases - responsible for 18% of the
world’s greenhouse gas emissions as measured in CO2 equivalents. In
comparison, the proportion of total CO2 emissions by passenger
vehicles is 12% of the total CO2. It produces 65% of human-related
nitrous oxide (which has 296 times the global warming potential of
CO2) and 37% of all human-induced methane (which is 23 times as
warming as CO2). Those numbers are confirmed in a 2007 article in
the British medical journal The Lancet,
which concludes that reducing consumption of animal products should
be a top priority, especially in developed countries where such a
measure would also entail substantial health benefits.
A 2006 study by Gidon Eshel and Pamela Martin,
assistant professors of geophysics at the University
of Chicago, found that a person switching from the average
American diet to a vegan diet would reduce CO2 emissions by 1,485
kg per
year.
The
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis argues
that while most meat production in industrialized countries uses
inefficient grain feeding methods through intensive
farming, meat production is not invariably a poor use of land,
especially in countries like China and Brazil. Since a
proportion of all grain crops produced are not suitable for human
consumption, they can be fed to animals to turn into meat, thus
improving efficiency. Nevertheless this does not apply to the
majority of grain crops worldwide, but only to small parts of them
in developing
countries. Further, greenhouse gas emissions are not limited to
animal husbandry; but also to several plant based sources such as
rice cultivation.
A 2007 study which simulated various diets' land
use for the geography of New York State
concluded that although vegetarian diets used the smallest amount
of land per capita, a diet which included some meat and
dairy—though significantly less than consumed by the
average American—could support more people on the same
available land, since animal food crops can be grown on lower
quality land than crops for human consumption.
It has been noted that the production of some
vegan food substitutes like soy, used to produce soymilk amongst other items, is
partly to blame for the deforestation of rainforests. However,
massive amounts of soy are used as animal feed rather than for
direct human consumption. And while it takes several pounds of soy
to produce a single pound of meat, a single pound of soy can be
used to produce several pounds of soy-based foods for humans.
Similar diets and lifestyles
seealso Vegetarianism and religionDiets such as raw veganism
and fruitarianism
are related to veganism, but have significant differences from
standard veganism. There are also numerous religious groups that
regularly or occasionally practice a similar diet, including
adherents to some Buddhist
traditions, Eastern
Orthodox Christians, Jains, Hindus, Sikhism, Rastafarians,
and
Seventh-day Adventists.
Cuisine
see also Vegetarian
cuisine
- Also see the Wikibooks Cookbook articles on vegan cuisine and vegan substitutions and its listing of vegan recipes.
See also
References
External links
- The Vegan Society (UK)
- American Vegan Society
- Vegan Society of Australia
- Vegans in South Africa (V.I.S.A.)
- Vegan Outreach, creators of the popular "Why Vegan?" pamphlet
- Vegan Action, administrators of vegan product certification in the US and Canada
- I Can't Believe It's Vegan!, a list of vegan commercial food products
- American Dietetic Association position on vegetarian diet
- American Dietetic Association: A new food guide for North American vegetarians
- Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
- Vegan Health, a project of Vegan Outreach
- Vegan nutrition, from the Vegan Society
- The Vegetarian and Vegan Foundation
- Movement for Compassionate Living
- People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA)
vegan in Asturian: Veganismu
vegan in Catalan: Veganisme
vegan in Czech: Veganství
vegan in Danish: Veganisme
vegan in German: Veganismus
vegan in Modern Greek (1453-): Αυστηρή
χορτοφαγία
vegan in Spanish: Veganismo
vegan in Esperanto: Veganismo
vegan in French: Végétalisme
vegan in Indonesian: Veganisme
vegan in Italian: Cucina vegana
vegan in Hebrew: טבעונות
vegan in Luxembourgish: Veganismus
vegan in Lithuanian: Veganizmas
vegan in Hungarian: Veganizmus
vegan in Dutch: Veganisme
vegan in Norwegian: Veganisme
vegan in Polish: Weganizm
vegan in Portuguese: Veganismo
vegan in Russian: Веганизм
vegan in Simple English: Veganism
vegan in Slovak: Vegánstvo
vegan in Finnish: Veganismi
vegan in Swedish: Veganism
vegan in Turkish: Vegan
vegan in Chinese: 純素食主義